-
Hats off Darine – really hats off … I was really hoping you’d miss out on something so i can add a valuable comment to your post, but frankly, the only thing i could think of based on the last event i attended (MediaMEforum) is that the air-conditioning made it seem like we were in Alaska (not in Jordan) and I caught a cold because of it.
I have to admit that I too learned something new from your post today – NETVIBES – i love the collage that could serve as a pre, during, and post event portal!
Thanks for sharing this post with me … you spoke my mind loud and clear! -
Excellent post Darine…
In fact we’ve been organising a similar but more complex event setup during the last couple of year at IGF and EuroDIG and similar events around Internet Governance. (with the exception of point 4 the automatic pictures, we had a dedicated live tweeting photographer who is also able to tag people’s names my friend @seiitiarata ).
You see we setup a full scale remote participation platform (also called: E-participation or Online Engagement) including audiocast/videocast/captioning/chat/twitterfeeds and most importantly we provide a dual communication way:
During the last IGF we had around 1500 people who attended physically the event in Vilnius and over 600 that connected online including 35 panellists participating remotely (which actually did many remote interventions live via audio and video) some of them were even MPs from European countries. Many other interventions where simple chat and/or tweets spoken loudly by each session’s moderator (we had 10 parallel sessions, each session had a dedicated moderator which represents remote people physically in the session). This was done for the duration of the 4 days of the event.
We also had dedicated social reporting bloggers.We organized almost the same setup in earlier year’s events as well.
we can talk more in depth later if like…All the best,
Bernard. -
Excellent post Darine. Please keep these articles coming. I would like to add the video aspect (if Internet helps) Maybe 2m max interview with speakers, participants, organizers…Will be really an additional success to the online coverage. We did this one in Amman in 09: http://www.netvibes.com/smextoday#MOBDATA
We used: Blogs, Flickr, Youtube, Wiki, Google doc (Internal) and of course Twitter with a screen to show the tweets. In every conference in Lebanon, the major problem is the Internet connection..Best,
Mohamad -
I think I mostly disagree with you, Darine. The purpose of tech expos is for vendors, innovators, inventors, developers and interested observers to be able to meet face to face and engage in discussions with one another in person. By encouraging people to attend and then broadcast their impressions out on the internet, they would be creating some pretty big problems for themselves. For one, attendees who doing that aren’t fully “there” – they are more interested in “reselling” the the demos and presentations they are seeing to people who aren’t present rather than actively participating in what’s going on. That takes control of how a technology is being presented and how it is described away from the people whose job it is to promote the tech. Some people may think this is a good thing, and some people may even think their opinions of a technology are more valuable than the opinions of the developers (and their competitors) but I don’t think many tech companies are in such a hurry to lose control of their “message”, right?
Also a lot of people will end up thinking they know all about a tech after they got it third or fourth hand, when in reality all they know is what they were told by whoever they were following on tweet that day. And as a software developer who has been made to man a booth a time or two, I can offer first hand testimony to the fact that at least half of the people who witness a demo don’t have any clue about what they just saw, and even after 10 or 15 minutes carefully answering their questions at least half of THAT half is even more clueless after its been explained than they were before. I personally would not want people who saw me do a software demo trying to explain it to their friends. But maybe that’s just me. In any case, that’s what marketing departments and trade journalists are for.
I’m not disputing that a lot of people on the net like to get the “inside scoop” in real time. I’m just saying, I don’t think that’s necessarily in the interests of the industry pros who tend to attend tech expos.
-
I believe here you are concerned about the speaker’s message getting across and the audience’s attention span. Your concern is valid I must admit and yet, audience can get distracted in whatever medium as long as they have their mobile devices and follow audience members with them.
Well, it’s not so much the message getting across as it is the speaker being able to make sure the audience understands the message. That’s not always easy, even in a one on one impromptu Q&A session in person. It doesn’t do anyone any good if the rumor-mill starts churning out a lot of misinformation about a product, or a technology.
On the other hand, I am studying the optimization of communication between audience and speakers as well as providing the audience with the best tools to fully monitor the event both during and after the conference, in addition to addressing the specific needs of digital natives (which are a large part of audiences at tech events) who are used to multitasking and using social media tools during events and the presence of which will enhance their event experience and not detract from it. (Satisfaction element)
Well, that could certainly work provided that there was a lively discussion amongst the people who were “attending” virtually, and provided at least some of the people in that discussion were well-informed and could explain stuff to those who weren’t. But that’s a bit hit-or-miss, and it’s just as likely there’ll be a know-it-all or two who sends everyone the wrong direction, right?
I agree this has a big appeal for many though? Being able to get all that buzz going about a product can make all the difference for a new tech. I think if I was running a new startup, I’d rather have people talking about my stuff even if everything they were saying was incorrect, than to have nobody even notice.
Another aspect I am indirectly addressing is event reach, PR and promotional coverage which is critical for every event organizer.
Yes, that’s a good point. I agree that for the organizers and the sponsors, the more they can make a venue appealing to potential attendees the better.


13 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://theidentitychef.com/2010/11/24/an-event-for-the-netizens/trackback/